"Seattle Officers Seek Anonymity in Supreme Court Case Tied to Jan. 6 Rally Attendance"

Case No. 22-1-04342-2SEA

The State of Washington vs Shane Lozenich

Arrested: 07/23/2021 | Released: 01/05/2022

Cause: Felony Harassment, Felony Telephone Harassment (Cyberstalking), Felony Threats To Bomb Or Injure Property, Misdemeanor Violation of No Contact Order - Case Pending

Case Summary

In Case No. 22-1-04342-2SEA, Shane Lozenich was arrested on July 23, 2021, by unidentified individuals in unmarked vehicles for alleged felony harassment, cyberstalking, and threats to bomb property—specifically targeting the Mayor of Seattle and Harborview Medical Center. During the arrest, Lozenich was not read his Miranda rights, and his phone was seized and searched without a warrant. A significant "procedural breakdown" occurred when Judge Melinda Young signed a 45-day inpatient restoration order on September 13, 2021, despite the absence of a formal competency evaluation or hearing. Following his transfer to Western State Hospital in November 2021, Lozenich was forced to receive a COVID booster and 20mg of olanzapine, a treatment justified by a facility psychiatrist using a non-clinical 2017 DSHS food stamp visit. Ultimately released in January 2022, Lozenich was advised by his attorney to enter an 18-month mental health court program to avoid a potential jail sentence, an outcome the Journal of Legal Systems & Civil Liberties characterizes as a "systemic failure" that substituted coercive treatment for due process. Throughout these events, Lozenich has maintained that he is a victim of Voice-to-Skull (V2K) torture, which he believes was used as a form of espionage against him.

Image: Former Mayor Jenny Durkan

The provided page documents Case No. 22-1-04342-2SEA (State of Washington vs. Shane Lozenich), a pending felony case involving allegations of harassment, cyberstalking, and threats to bomb or injure property—specifically targeting the Mayor of Seattle and facilities like Harborview Medical Center.

Arrest and Initial Procedural Anomalies

On July 23, 2021, Lozenich was arrested by unidentified individuals in unmarked vehicles who were not wearing standard police uniforms. He reports that he was never read his Miranda rights, his backpack was searched without explanation, and his phone was seized and logged as evidence without a warrant. The arrest was reportedly based on a photocopy of a passport and Social Security card found in his bag that did not belong to him, as well as digital evidence (emails and Twitter posts) that Lozenich was not permitted to review.

Contested Competency and Restoration

The page details a "procedural breakdown" regarding Lozenich’s competency proceedings:

Order Without a Hearing: On September 13, 2021, Judge Melinda Young signed a 45-day inpatient restoration order despite the fact that no formal competency evaluation had occurred and no hearing had been held. The order was signed "approved on record" without the presence or signature of Lozenich's attorney.
Retroactive Justification: An evaluation dated August 31, 2021, by Claire Ashbaugh, PhD, diagnosed Lozenich with an unspecified psychotic disorder even though he did not participate in the interview.
Western State Hospital: After an abrupt transfer in November 2021, Lozenich was forced to take a COVID booster and 20mg of olanzapine. The facility psychiatrist reportedly justified the medication based on a 2017 DSHS food stamps visit, which contained no clinical diagnosis or evaluation.

Release and Mental Health Court

Lozenich completed the restoration program early and was released from Western State Hospital in January 2022. To avoid a potential 18-month jail sentence if found guilty at trial, his attorney advised moving the case to "mental health court," a coercive alternative requiring an 18-month program. He was released from jail in late January 2022, though he noted that the release order did not mention any program conditions.

Claims of Harassment and Broader Context

Voice-to-Skull (V2K): Lozenich maintains he is a victim of electronic harassment or V2K torture, which he believes was used as a form of espionage to gather information on his case.
Scapegoating: He suggests he may have been a scapegoat for actual threats, citing historical events like the 2019 radiation leak and 2023 explosions near Harborview to prove the facility was already a target for others.
Political Factors: He contextualizes his arrest within the atmosphere of the 2021 government shutdown threats and the involvement of Seattle police officers in the January 6th Capitol attack, implying institutional corruption and a need for police to justify funding for lawsuits.

The case study from the Journal of Legal Systems & Civil Liberties concludes that this matter represents a systemic failure, where criminal charges and mental health adjudication converged to undermine the rights of the accused through the "substitution of treatment for trial".

CASE DOCUMENTS

CONTACT INFORMATION

Dexter Horton Building

710 Second Ave Suite 1000

Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 477-5814 (office)

Amy Parker, Public Defender

amy.parker@kingcounty.gov

(206) 735-9591 (cell)

Kevin Toth, Mitigation Specialist

ktoth@kingcounty.gov

(206) 624-8105 (office)

Western State Hospital

9601 Steilacoom Boulevard SW,

Lakewood, WA 98498 (253) 582-8900 (office)

Claire Ashbaugh, PhD, Evaluator

ashbacs@dshs.wa.gov (206) 289-2052 (office)

Melinda J Young, Judge

(206) 289-2052 (office)

Dr. Sukhinderpal Aulaka, MD

(253) 582-8900 (office)

Statistics Related to Charges

During a period marked by significant national and global security shifts, Lozenich experienced a convergence of systemic data vulnerabilities and personal targeting. In 2021, the U.S. Bomb Data Center reported a 56% increase in explosive incidents since 2015, recording 1,876 bomb threats and nearly 5,000 suspicious packages nationwide. Simultaneously, global cyberattacks rose by 50% year-over-year, with organizations facing an average of 925 attacks per week. Locally, Lozenich’s personal information was compromised in a major Washington State unemployment data breach, leading to the hacking of multiple email accounts and personal applications. Despite reaching out to government officials responsible for the data security failure, Lozenich received no response. Following an arrest and the implementation of a protection order, Lozenich was barred from returning to a leased residence, creating severe barriers to maintaining stable employment.

Throughout these legal and logistical challenges, Lozenich reports being subjected to relentless "voice-to-skull" (V2K) technology or electronic harassment. This reported torture involves directed signals that interface with the nervous system, allowing abusers to allegedly see through Lozenich's eyes and monitor auditory surroundings as a form of espionage. The physical and psychological impact includes chronic pain, extreme exhaustion, and the forced witnessing of traumatic auditory events, such as the reported sound of a bus explosion and threats against aircraft. Despite repeatedly reporting these incidents and the potential use of this technology to facilitate criminal acts, Lozenich maintains that jail staff and government agencies have failed to investigate these claims or provide protection.

Case Analysis

Surveillance, Silence, & Systemic Failure: A Case Study of Procedural Breakdown in Seattle

Abstract

This article examines State of Washington v. Shane Lozenich (Case No. 22-1-04342-2SEA), a pending felony case involving allegations of harassment, cyberstalking, and threats to public officials and institutions. The defendant’s experience reveals systemic failures in due process, legal representation, and psychiatric adjudication. The analysis highlights the troubling use of competency evaluations and restoration orders without formal hearings, the lack of informed consent in psychiatric treatment, and the erosion of defendant autonomy in mental health court proceedings.

Legal Issues Raised

1. Arrest Without Miranda Warning or Probable Cause

Documentation Defendant was arrested by unidentified officers in unmarked vehicles
No Miranda rights read; no warrant issued for phone seizure
Arrest based on alleged digital evidence not reviewed by defendant

2. Competency Evaluation and Restoration Without Hearing

No formal competency evaluation conducted prior to court order
Restoration order signed without defendant or attorney present
Evaluation dated August 31, 2021, was never disclosed to defendant

3. Involuntary Psychiatric Treatment and Medication

Defendant transferred to Western State Hospital without notice
Forced administration of olanzapine based on unrelated 2017 DSHS visit
No informed consent or diagnostic justification provided

4. Mental Health Court as Coercive Alternative

Defendant advised to enter 18-month program to avoid trial
No alternative options presented; trial discouraged by counsel
Defendant’s preference to speak in court overridden by strategic concerns

Commentary Implications

1. Judicial Transparency and Procedural Integrity

The absence of a formal competency hearing and the retroactive use of unrelated DSHS records to justify psychiatric restoration reflect a breakdown in judicial transparency. Restoration orders must be based on clear, documented evaluations and involve the defendant’s participation.

2. Rights of the Accused in Mental Health Proceedings

Mental health court is often presented as a compassionate alternative to incarceration. However, when participation is coerced or uninformed, it risks becoming a substitute for due process rather than a supplement to it.

3. Informed Consent and Psychiatric Ethics

The administration of psychiatric medication without consent or explanation violates medical ethics and patient rights. The use of olanzapine based on a non-clinical interaction from 2017 raises serious concerns about record misuse and diagnostic integrity.

4. Digital Evidence and Privacy Violations

The seizure of the defendant’s phone without a warrant and the use of alleged online activity to justify arrest highlight the need for clearer standards in digital evidence collection and Fourth Amendment protections.

Conclusion

State of Washington v. Shane Lozenich illustrates how criminal charges, mental health adjudication, and digital surveillance can converge to undermine the rights of the accused. The case calls for urgent reform in competency proceedings, psychiatric restoration protocols, and the ethical boundaries of mental health court. Without these safeguards, the justice system risks substituting treatment for trial—and coercion for care.